VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Krishnan. U v. The Authorised Officer

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
28 August 2023
Bench
The Chief Justice, P.Vadamalaiauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 19652/2023

Judgment

O R D E R [Order of the Court was made by The Hon'ble CHIEF JUSTICE] Heard Mr.G.Vishnuram, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.N.Dilip Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the respondent.

¶2The matter is placed today "for reporting compliance".

¶3On 11.08.2023, this Court observed that the petitioner has undertaken to deposit Rs.13,00,000/- (Rupees Thirteen lakhs only) on or before 25.08.2023. The Court, in view of the said undertaking, directed that status quo shall be maintained till

25.08.2023. The Court further observed that if the petitioner did not show his bonafides, as undertaken before this Court, it is open to the respondent/Bank to proceed with the matter in accordance with law and the petitioner shall pursue his remedy before the Debts Recovery Tribunal, Madurai.

¶4As the petitioner has not complied with the undertaking, the order of this Court stands.

¶5The Writ Petition stands disposed of in terms of the order, dated 11.08.2023. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. [S.V.G., C.J.] [P.V.M., J.]

28.08.2023 Index : Yes / No

RM THE HONOURABLE CHIEF JUSTICE and P.VADAMALAI , J . RM

28.08.2023 ____________https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 28.08.2023 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR.SANJAY V.GANGAPURWALA, CHIEF JUSTICE and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.VADAMALAI and W.M.P(MD)Nos.16229 & 16231 of 2023 U.Krishnan ... Petitioner Vs. The Authorized Officer, Union Bank of India, Asset Recovery Branch, No.51, Rosary Church Building, Town Hall Road, Madurai - 625 001. ... Respondent PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records pertaining to the impugned e-auction sale notice, dated 26.06.2023 issued by the respondent and quash the same as illegal. For Petitioner : Mr.G.Vishnuram For Respondent : Mr.N.Dilip Kumar

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.