Murugan v. The District Collector

O R D E R The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the prayer sought for in the writ petition has become infructuous and seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.

¶2In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.

20.03.2023 NCC: Yes / No Index :Yes / No Speaking Order : Yes / No mbi To

1.The District Collector, Sivagangai District, Sivagangai.

2.The Thasildar, Thasildar Office, Sivagangai Taluk, Sivagangai District.

B.PUGALENDHI, J. mbi

20.03.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 20.03.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI WP(MD)No.8434/2014 & MP(MD)Nos.1 & 2/2014 Murugan ...Petitioner Vs 1.The District Collector, Sivagangai District, Sivagangai. 2.The Thasildar, Thasildar Office, Sivagangai Taluk, Sivagangai District. ...Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records pertaining to the impugned notice issued by the second respondent dated 30.04.2014 in proceedings in Na.Ka.No.A5/2047/2014 and quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.C.Ezhilarasu For Respondents : Mrs.K.Christy Theboral, Additional Government Pleader for R1 and R3 Mr.S.Srinivasa Raghavan for R3