- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 11 April 2023
- Bench
- G.R.Swaminathan, B.Pugalendhi
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 9269/2014
Judgment
ORDER The learned counsel for the petitioner informs the Court that the writ petitioner is no more. Hence, this writ petition is closed as abated. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. (G.R.S.J.,) & (B.P.J.,)
11.04.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No ias To:-
1.The District Collector, Thoothukudi District.
2.The Thasildar, Kovilpatti Taluk, Thoothukudi District.
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. and
B.PUGALENDHI, J. ias
11.04.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 11.04.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI and M.P.(MD)Nos.1, 2 and 3 of 2014 P.Mariyappan ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Thoothukudi District, Thoothukudi. 2.The Thasildar,, Kovilpatti Taluk, Thoothukudi District. 3.The Commissioner of Panchayat Union, Kovilpatti, Thoothukudi District. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorari, call for the records relating to the impugned notice dated 06.06.2014 issued by the 3rd Respondent and quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Samidurai For Respondents : Mr.K.Balasubramani, Spl. Government Pleader.
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.