S. Natchimuthu Gounder, v. The District Collector

ORDER Heard the learned counsel on either side.

¶2The petitioner wants the petition mentioned pathway to be surveyed and demarcated. It appears that the petitioner is having a civil dispute with one Muthuraj. The said Muthuraj has not been impleaded as a party in this writ petition. I am therefore not in a position to grant relief. It is open to the petitioner to submit a fresh application before the fourth respondent. The fourth respondent shall take a call after issuing notice to the said Muthuraj and others. I consciously refrain from entering into the merits of the matter.

¶3With this liberty to the petitioner, this writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

31.08.2023 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No NCC : Yes / No MGA To

1.The District Collector, Theni District, Theni.

2.The District Revenue Officer, Theni Collectorate, Theni District.

3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Periyakulam, Theni District.

4.The Tahsildar, Theni Taluk, Theni District.

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. MGA

31.08.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 31.08.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN and M.P(MD)No.1 of 2015 S.Natchimuthu Gounder ... Petitioner Vs 1.The District Collector, Theni District, Theni. 2.The District Revenue Officer, Theni Collectorate, Theni District. 3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Periyakulam, Theni District. 4.The Tahsildar, Theni Taluk, Theni District. ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent to demarcate the pathway in Survey No.103/4J and 103/7 of Koduvilarpatti village, Theni Taluk, Theni District by considering the Petitioner's representation dated 17.08.2015 on the file of the respondents 3 and 4. For Petitioner : Mr.V.Gopalsamy For Respondents : Mr.D.Gandhiraj Special Government Pleader