- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 17 July 2023
- Bench
- G.R.Swaminathan
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 18136/2015
Judgment
ORDER Heard the learned counsel on either side.
2.The learned counsel for the petitioner reiterated all the contentions set out in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition and called upon this Court to grant relief as prayed for.
3.The learned counsel for the fourth respondent pointed out that the writ petitioner had passed away long back. He also would state that the fourth respondent herein namely, Thiru.Rajaram filed O.S.No.18 of 2011 on the file of District Munsif Court, Andipatti. Palpandi was shown as the first defendant. Following his demise, his legal heirs came on record. Palpandi had also filed O.S.No.183 of 2011 on the file of District Munsif Court, Andipatti. While the suit filed by Palpandi suffered dismissal, the suit filed by Rajaram was decreed as prayed for. It is also stated that the decrees have not been put to challenge till date.
4.In any event, since the Civil Court had already decided the issue, the question of revenue authorities going into the matter does not arise. If any appeals are filed, the rights of the parties will abide by the outcome of the appeals.
5.With this observation, this writ petition is dismissed. No costs.
17.07.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No ias To:-
1.The District Collector, Theni District, Theni.
2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Periyakulam, Theni District.
3.The Tahsildar, Andipatti Taluk, Theni District.
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. ias
17.07.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 17.07.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN A.Palpandi ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Theni District, Theni. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Periyakulam, Theni District. 3.The Tahsildar, Andipatti Taluk, Theni District. 4.P.Rajaram ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the Respondents 1 to 3 issue patta in the name of the petitioner based on the petitioner's representation dated 21.09.2015 within the period that may be stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.G.Sundaram For Respondents : Mr.S.RA.Ramachandran, Addl. Government Pleader for R1 to R3. Mr.S.Rajasekar for R4.
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.