C. Joseph Rajan v. The District Registrar

ORDER Heard the learned counsel on either side.

2.The petitioner wants the authorities to take action in terms of Circular No.67 dated 03.11.2011. The said circular itself has been withdrawn. The petitioner has to necessarily move the jurisdictional Civil Court for establishing his rights.

3.Granting such liberty, this writ petition is dismissed. No costs.

17.07.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No ias To:-

1.The District Registrar, Office of District Registrar, Kokirakulam, Tirunelveli.

2.The Sub Registrar, Palayamkottai Sub Registration Office, Kokirakullam, Tirunelveli.

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. ias

17.07.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 17.07.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN C.Joseph Rajan ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Registrar, Office of District Registrar, Kokirakulam, Tirunelveli. 2.The Sub Registrar, Palayamkottai Sub Registration Office, Kokirakullam, Tirunelveli. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to dispose of the Representation of the Petitioner dated 21.08.2015 in the light of Circular No.67 dated 03.11.2011 in C.No.52338/C1/2011 issued by the The Inspector General of Registration, Chennai within the period stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.Pon Senthil Kumaran For Respondents : Mr.N.GA.Nataraj, Government Advocate.