- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 29 November 2023
- Bench
- The Chief Justice, K.K. Ramakrishnan
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 1824/2015
Judgment
O R D E R [Order of the Court was made by The Hon'ble CHIEF JUSTICE] The learned Advocate for the petitioner submits that the prayer in the writ petition has become infructuous.
¶2In view of that, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.
[S.V.G., .C.J.] [K.K.R.K., J.]
29.11.2023 Index : Yes / No : Yes / No
bala To:
¶1The District Collector, Madurai, Madurai District.
¶2The Block Developement Officer, Thiruparankundram Union, Thirunagar, Madurai District. THE HONOURABLE CHIEF JUSTICE and K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN , J . bala
29.11.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 29.11.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.SANJAY V.GANGAPURWALA, CHIEF JUSTICE and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN W.P(MD)No.1824 of 2015 S.Mari ... Petitioner -vs- 1. The District Collector, Madurai, Madurai District. 2. The Block Developement Officer, Thiruparankundram Union, Thirunagar, Madurai District. 3. R. Dharmaveeran ... Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st and 2nd respondents to take action against the 3rd respondent for running a fish farm illegally in the ''Udaikulam Kanmai'' situated in Iyyan Pappakudi Village, Madurai South Taluk, Madurai District and consequently ensure protection to the agriculture depending on the ''Udaikulam Kanmoi''. For Petitioner : Mr.N.Anandakumar For R1 : Mr.P.Thilakkumar, Government Pleader For R2 : Mr.T.R.Janardhanan For R3 : Mr.T.Aswin Rajasimman for M/s.Lajapathi Roy and Associates
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.