- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 10 August 2023
- Bench
- G.R.Swaminathan
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 18373/2015
Judgment
ORDER Heard the learned counsel on either side.
¶2The petitioner is a resident of South Thittankulam Panchayat. He alleges that on account of activities of the respondents 5 and 6, the Panchayat was put to substantial revenue loss. The sixth respondent is none other than the wife of the fifth respondent. The fifth respondent was murdered on 22.08.2022. He was also the president of the Panchayat.
¶3The allegation of the writ petitioner is that a number of buildings in the Panchayat have not been assessed to property tax. The allegation made by the petitioner was enquired into. It has been noticed that on account of such non assessment, loss to the tune of Rs.3,77,550/- was caused to the local body. It is stated that surcharge proceedings are proposed to be initiated.
¶4The Assistant Director (Village Panchayats), Thoothukudi District is directed to take further action under the Tamil Nadu Panchayats (Surcharge, Disallowance and Charge) Rules, 2000. The statutory procedure shall be adhered to. Notices shall be given. In any event, final order shall be passed on merits and in accordance with law by the said authority within a period of five months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. I make it clear that I have not gone into the merits of the matter. All the defences and contentions of the sixth respondent are left open.
¶5This writ petition is disposed of accordingly. There shall be no order as to costs.
10.08.2023 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No NCC : Yes / No MGA To
1.The Principal Secretary, O/o. Department of Panchayat Raj and Municipalities, Secretariat, Chennai.
2.The Director, O/o. Department of Panchayat Raj and Municipalities, Panagal Maligai, Saidapet, Chennai.
3.The District Collector, O/o.The District Collector Office, Thoothukudi District.
4.The Block Development Officer (Panchayat), Block Development Office, Kovilpatti, Thoothukudi District. Copy to: The Assistant Director (Village Panchayats), Thoothukudi District.
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. MGA
10.08.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 10.08.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN A.Thambidurai ... Petitioner Vs 1.The Principal Secretary, O/o. Department of Panchayat Raj and Municipalities, Secretariat, Chennai. 2.The Director, O/o. Department of Panchayat Raj and Municipalities, Panagal Maligai, Saidapet, Chennai. 3.The District Collector, O/o.The District Collector Office, Thoothukudi District. 4.The Block Development Officer (Panchayat), Block Development Office, Kovilpatti, Thoothukudi District. 5.Ponnuraju 6.Ponnuthai ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 4 to consider the petitioner's representation dated 23.05.2015 and to take appropriate action against the offenders by conducting an enquiry through special officers within stipulated time frame fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Ganesh Prabu For Respondents : Mr.N.Satheesh Kumar Additional Government Pleader for R.1 to R.4 Mr.G.Thalaimutharasu for R.6 No Appearance for R.5
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.