- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 26 September 2023
- Bench
- G.R.Swaminathan
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 18507/2015
Judgment
ORDER Heard both sides.
2.The petitioner challenges the impugned order passed by the fourth respondent disconnecting the supply of electricity. The petitioner was running a saw mill and since the petitioner had not obtained renewal during the relevant time, disconnection came to be effected. During the pendency of the writ petition, the petitioner's mill license had been renewed. Mr.Sathish, Forester, Madurai Division is present in person before this Court. He also states that the petitioner's license has been renewed.
3.Recording the same, this writ petition is disposed of. Connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
26.09.2023 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No skm To
1.The Member Secretary, The Central Empowered Committee, Gate No.31, Jawaharlal Nehru Stadium, Lodhi Road, New Delhi – 110 003.
2.The District Collector, Collectorate, Madurai District.
3.The District Forest Officer, O/o.the District Forest Officer, Madurai Division, Madurai, Madurai District.
4.The Assistant Executive Engineer, Distribution / Metro, TANGEDCO, Melamadai, Madurai - 625 020.
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. skm WP(MD)No.18507 of 2015 and MP(MD)Nos.1 & 2 of 2015
26.09.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 26.09.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN WP(MD)No.18507 of 2015 and MP(MD)Nos.1 & 2 of 2015 R.Feroz Jahan ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Member Secretary, The Central Empowered Committee, Gate No.31, Jawaharlal Nehru Stadium, Lodhi Road, New Delhi – 110 003. 2.The District Collector, Collectorate, Madurai District. 3.The District Forest Officer, O/o.the District Forest Officer, Madurai Division, Madurai, Madurai District. 4.The Assistant Executive Engineer, Distribution / Metro, TANGEDCO, Melamadai, Madurai - 625 020. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records pertaining to the impugned order in Ka.No.U.Se.Po.Pakir.Mela.Ko.A.No. 208 dated 07.10.2015 on the file of respondent No.4 and quash the same as illegal and consequently direct the respondent No.3 to get the report from the respondent No.1 Central Empowered committee and consequently grant licence for the petitioner's Saw Mill namely R.R.Saw Mill situated at 88/1, Mastanpatti, Madurai District as per the Rule 4(2) of the Tamil Nadu Regulation of Wood Based Industries Rules, 2010 within the time stipulated by this Court. For petitioner : Mr.S.Rajasekar For Respondents : Mr.S.Shanmugavel, Additional Government Pleader for R1 to R3 Mr.S.Deenadhayalan for R4
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.