- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 21 July 2023
- Bench
- G.R.Swaminathan
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 18992/2015
Judgment
ORDER
Heard the learned counsel on either side.
2.The matter has become infructuous and this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
21.07.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No ias
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. ias
21.07.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 21.07.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN and M.P.(MD)Nos.1 and 2 of 2015 Thangaswamy ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Union of India, Rep. by its Secretary, Finance Department, Secretariat, New Delhi. 2.The General Manager, Reserve Bank of India, No.16 Rajaji Salai, Chennai. 3.The Branch Manager, Muthoot Finance Ltd., Opp. to Sivanthi Hospital, Kanyakumari - 629 702. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 and 2 to regulate the rate of interest being charged by the 3rd respondent herein for the gold loan pledged by the petitioner under gold loan Account No.066425 dated 28.02.2014. For Petitioner : Mr.T.Selvakumaran For Respondents : Mr.P.Paulpandi for R1. Mr.K.R.Laxman for R2. No appearance for R3.
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.