V.C.Rajendiran v. The Home Secretary

ORDER Heard the learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioner and the learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the official respondents.

¶2The petitioner is a contractor and a business man. He alleges that the Police are harassing him and foisting false cases. That led to the filing of this writ petition.

¶3The prayer in this writ petition is too general and sweeping. If specific instances of breach of human rights is brought to the notice of this Court, then it can be examined. This Court will not be justified in issuing a direction of general nature.

¶4Granting liberty to the petitioner to move this Court if he has any specific grievance, this writ petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

06.07.2023 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No NCC : Yes / No MGA To

1.The Home Secreatary, State of Tamil Nadu, Secretariat, Fort St.George,

2.The Director General of Police, Office of the Director General of Police, Beach Road,

3.The Superintendent of Police, Office of the Superintendent of Police,

4.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Office of the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Vedachanthoor Sub-Division,

5.The Inspector of Police, Eriodu Police Station,

6.The Inspector of Police, Vedachanthoor Police Station,

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. MGA and M.P(MD)No.1 of 2015

06.07.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 06.07.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN and M.P(MD)No.1 of 2015 V.C.Rajendiran ... Petitioner Vs 1.The Home Secreatary, State of Tamil Nadu, Secretariat, Fort St.George, 2.The Director General of Police, Office of the Director General of Police, Beach Road, 3.The Superintendent of Police, Office of the Superintendent of Police, 4.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Office of the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Vedachanthoor Sub-Division, 5.The Inspector of Police, Eriodu Police Station, 6.The Inspector of Police, Vedachanthoor Police Station, 7.Mohan Kumar 8.Surech 9.Jayachandran 10.Aranganayaki ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 and 2 to strictly instruct the respondent 4 to 10 for not to intervene into the petitioner's regular business activities and not to prevent his free movement in and around Vadachanthoor and other places. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Alagumani For Respondents : Mr.D.Gandhirai Special Government Pleader for R.1 to R.6 No Appearance for R.7 to R.10