Ramaraj. M v. The District Collector

O R D E R [Order of the Court was made by S.S.SUNDAR, J.] Mr.M.Lingadurai, learned Special Government Pleader, takes notice for the respondents 1 to 3.

¶2Since we are not passing any adverse orders, notice to the respondents 4 to 7 is dispensed with.

¶3With the consent of both sides, this writ petition is taken up for final hearing at the admission stage itself.

¶4This writ petition is filed for issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 3 to remove the encroachments made by the respondents 4 to 7 in 4 Metre width road at Melatheru, Naganai, comprised in Re-Survey No.39/1A of Pannampaarai Village, Sattankulam Taluk, Thoothukudi District, based on the petitioner's representation dated

06.04.2023.

¶5The petitioner states that he is the owner of the property comprised in Re-Survey No.46/2 of Pannampaarai Village, Naganai, Sattankulam Taluk, Thoothukudi District. It is the case of the petitioner that on the southern side of the property purchased by him in Re-Survey No.46/2, there exists a 4 Meter width cart track in Survey No.39/1A in the same village. Stating that the private respondents, who own major extent of land in Re-Survey No.39/1A, have encroached the 4 Meter width cart track, on

06.04.2023, the petitioner sent a representation to the official respondents seeking removal of encroachment made by the private respondents in the 4 Meter width road.

¶6To be noted, this Court, having regard to the facts narrated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, is unable to find any right vested in the petitioner to use the cart track, as described or claimed by him in the affidavit.

¶7Learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1 to 3 produced before this Court the revenue records to show that the property in Survey No.39/1A is a patta land and the entire land is registered in the holding of several individuals, including the respondents 4 to 7 herein.

¶8This Court finds that the petitioner tries to establish his right of easement over the property, which is adjacent to his land, on the basis of the mark as detailed in the F.M.B. That does not give any right to the petitioner to claim every physical feature that is detailed in the F.M.B. is existing on ground for all the time to come. However, it may be open to the petitioner to establish his right of easement by filing a suit before the Civil Court.

¶9Accordingly, with a liberty preserved to the petitioner to approach the Civil Court for appropriate relief, this writ petition is dismissed. No costs.

[S.S.S.R., J.] [D.B.C., J.]

17.08.2023 NCC : Index : Internet :

krk To:

1.The District Collector, Thoothukudi District, At Thoothukudi.

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Thiruchendur, Thoothukudi District.

3.The Thasildar, Sattankulam Taluk, Thoothukudi District. S.S.SUNDAR , J . and D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY , J . krk

17.08.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 17.08.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.S.SUNDAR and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY M.Ramaraj ... Petitioner -vs- 1.The District Collector Thoothukudi District At Thoothukudi 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer Thiruchendur Thoothukudi District 3.The Thasildar Sattankulam Taluk Thoothukudi District 4.Sudalai 5.Duraipandi 6.Gunasekaran 7.Muthuraman ... Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 3 to remove the encroachments made by the respondents 4 to 7 in 4 metre width road at Melatheru, Naganai, comprised in Re Survey No.39/1A, Pannampaarai Village, Sattankulam Taluk, Thoothukudi District, based on the petitioner's representation dated 06.04.2023. For Petitioner : Mr.Charles Kamalesh M.Appaji For Respondents : Mr.M.Lingadurai Special Government Pleader for R1 to R3