S.R. Sethu v. The Revenue Divisional

ORDER The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner states that the matter has been amicably settled with the third respondent.

¶2Recording the said submission, this writ petition stands closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

10.08.2023 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No NCC : Yes / No MGA To

1.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Periyakulam,

2.The Tahsildar, Theni Taluk,

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. MGA and M.P(MD)Nos.2 & 3 of 2015

10.08.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 10.08.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN and M.P(MD)Nos.2 & 3 of 2015 S.R.Sethu ... Petitioner Vs 1.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Periyakulam, 2.The Tahsildar, Theni Taluk, 3.M.Manuneedhi ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records relating to the impugned order dated 06.08.2012 in RTR, 457/2011/A3 on the file of the second respondent as well as the entire consequential proceeding including issuance of patta, Sub-divisions made and quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.A.Mohamed Haneef For Respondents : Mr.S.RA.Ramachandran Additional Government Pleader for R.1 & R.2 Mr.D.Nallathambi for R.3