R.Ramakrishnan v. The District Collector

ORDER The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this petition. He also made an endorsement to this effect.

¶2In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.

28.07.2023 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No NCC : Yes / No MGA To

1.The District Collector, Dindigul District.

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Office of the Revenue Divisional Officer, Dindigul District.

3.The Tahsildar, Natham Taluk Office, Natham, Dindigul District.

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. MGA

28.07.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 28.07.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN R.Ramakrishnan ... Petitioner Vs 1.The District Collector, Dindigul District. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Office of the Revenue Divisional Officer, Dindigul District. 3.The Tahsildar, Natham Taluk Office, Natham, Dindigul District. 4.Jansi @ Mariyayee 5.Kowsalya 6.Bhuvaneswari 7.Ambiga 8.Sasikala (R.4 to R.8 are impleaded vide order of this Court dated 19.07.2023 in W.M.P(MD)No.19675 of 2015) ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents herein to cancel the patta in respect of the properties covered in Survey No.151/6, 158/1, 152, 158, 198/1, 197/15 and 233/3 of a total extent of 23 acres 43 cents situated at velampatti Village, Natham Taluk, Dindigul District and transfer into petitioner's name based on petitioner's representation dated 25.09.2015 within the time stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Ramakrishnan for Mr.B.Jameel Arasu For Respondents : Mr.N.Ga.Nataraj Government Advocate for R.1 to R.3