- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 26 July 2023
- Bench
- G.R.Swaminathan
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 19723/2015
Judgment
ORDER Heard the learned counsel on either side.
¶2The petitioner challenges mutation of patta in favour of the private respondents. The private respondents are the legal heirs of one Tambula Naicker. In the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, it is stated by the petitioner himself that he had sold the property in favour of Tambula Naicker. In the same breadth, a further claim is made that he repurchased the property. In the typed set of papers, no document of reconveyance has been enclosed. In the counter affidavit filed by the Tahsildar Vedachandur, it is stated that the petitioner had already filed O.S.No.215 of 2014 on the file of the Sub Court, Vedachandur against the private respondents herein. The petitioner can very well pursue his remedy in the pending civil suit. The rights of the parties will abide by the outcome of the civil proceedings.
¶3With this observation and clarification, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
26.07.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No rmi To
1.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Office of the Revenue Divisional Office, Palani, Dindigul District.
2.The Tahsildar, Office of the Taluk Office, Vedasandoor, Dindigul District.
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. rmi
26.07.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 26.07.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN and W.M.P.(MD)Nos. 1 & 2 of 2015 M.Ettama Naicker ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Office of the Revenue Divisional Office, Palani, Dindigul District. 2.The Tahsildar, Office of the Taluk Office, Vedasandoor, Dindigul District. 3.Bommakkal 4.Bommi Naicker 5.Chakkammal 6.Andichamy 7.Kannammal ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records pertaining to the proceedings relating to Patta No.661 in so far as survey No.1245/2 of an extent of 1 acres 25 cents situated at Ayyalur Village, Vedasandoor Taluk, issued by the 2nd respondent and quash the same. For Petitioners : Mr.R.Suresh Kumar For Respondents : Mr.S.RA.Ramachandran Additional Government Pleader for R1 & R2 : Mr.P.Arun Jeyatram for R3 to R7
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.