VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Vinothkumar v. The Inspector of Police

DISMISSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
21 August 2023
Bench
G.Ilangovanauthor
Case no.
CRL OP(MD) 15142/2023

Judgment

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 21/08/2023 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.ILANGOVAN Vinothkumar

... Petitioner/Accused No.2

Vs The State, through The Inspector of Police, Alanganallur Police Station, Madurai District. (Crime No.213 of 2023). ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.C.Ezhilarasu, Advocate. For Respondent : Mr.R.Suresh Kumar, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C. PRAYER :-For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.213 of 2023 on the file of the Respondent Police ORDER : The Court made the following order :-

The petitioner/Accused No.2, apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent Police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 392 of I.P.C, in Crime 213 of 2023 on the file of the respondent Police, seeks anticipatory bail.

¶2The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along with other accused persons snatched eight sovereigns of gold chain from the defacto complainant and tried to ran away from the place of occurrence, however, when other came there to rescue, they left the chain and ran away. Hence, the complaint.

¶3The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent and is no way connected in this case. Further, the petitioner is the friend of first accused. When both of them drove the two wheeler in the defacto complainant's street, questioned the petitioner, due to that wordy quarrel arose between the petitioner and the defacto complainant. Hence, the false cae has been foisted against them.

¶4The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) would submit that the petitioner is having two previous cases, which are not in similar nature. Further, after completion of investigation, Charge Sheet has been filed, showing this petitioner as absconding accused before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Vadipatti.

¶5Since the Charge Sheet has been filed before the concerned trial Court, let the petitioner appear before Judicial Magistrate, Vadipatti and seek regular bail. (*)6. Considering the facts since Final Report has been filed before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Vadipatti, let the petitioner appear before the concerned Court and execute the bond under Section 88 of Cr.P.C. to the satisfaction and as required by the trial Court.

sd/-

21/08/2023 (*)AMENDED AS PER ORDER OF THIS COURT DATED 25.09.2023 IN CRL OP(MD) NO.17176 OF 2023

/ TRUE COPY /

/10/2023

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S. )

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,

Madurai - 625 023. INDU TO TO BE SUBSTITUTED WITH THE ORDER DATED 21/08/2023 ALREADY DESPATCHED

1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, VADIPATTI 2 DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MADURAI.

3.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALANGANALLUR POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT. 4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.15142 of 2023 Date :21/08/2023 PKP/VRS/SAR- /08.09.2023/ 4P/3C RK/DD (04.10.2023) 4P/5C Madurai Bench of Madras High Court is issuing certified copies in this format from 17/07/2023

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.