- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 4 August 2023
- Bench
- B.Pugalendhi
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 22213/2022
Judgment
ORDER The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has circulated a letter dated 31.07.2023 to the Registrar (Judicial) for withdrawing the writ petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.
¶2Based on the letter dated 31.07.2023, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
04.08.2023 ogy NCC : Yes / No. Index : Yes / No. Internet : Yes / No. To
¶1The Block Development Officer, Thiruchuli Panchayat Union, Thiruchuli, Virudhunagar District.
¶2The Panchayat President, Kalayar Karisalkulam (East), Aruppukottai Taluk, Virudhunagar District.
B.PUGALENDHI, J. ogy
04.08.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 04.08.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI N.Solaraj ... Petitioner versus 1. The Block Development Officer, Thiruchuli Panchayat Union, Thiruchuli, Virudhunagar District. 2. The Panchayat President, Kalayar Karisalkulam (East), Aruppukottai Taluk, Virudhunagar District. 3. Baskaran 4. Pandithai ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, to direct the 2nd respondent to initiate appropriate proceedings based on the communication of the 1st respondent dated 18.03.2022 for providing water connection to the petitioner's house. For Petitioner : Mr.A.Srinivasan For R1 and R2 : Mr.G.V.Vairam Santhosh, Additional Government Pleader
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.