VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

G. Ramar v. Director of Town Panchayats

DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
25 July 2023
Bench
G.R.Swaminathanauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 20858/2015

Judgment

O R D E R The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the matter has now become infructuous and that nothing survives for further adjudication. 3 W.P.(MD)NO.20858 OF 2015

¶2In view of the same, this writ petition stands dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

25.07.2023 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No PMU To:

¶1The Director of Town Panchayats, O/o.The Directorate of Town Panchayats, Chennai – 600 108.

¶2The Assistant Executive Engineer, Town Panchayats, Sivagangai District. 4 W.P.(MD)NO.20858 OF 2015 G.R.SWAMINATHAN,J. PMU W.P.(MD)No.20858 of 2015

25.07.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

1 W.P.(MD)NO.20858 OF 2015 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 25.07.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN W.P.(MD)No.20858 of 2015 AND M.P.(MD)Nos.1 & 2 of 2015 G.Ramar, Class I Works Contractor, 49/14, Old Tank Office Road, Kamuthi Taluk, Kamuthi, Ramanathapuram District. ... Petitioner Vs. 1. The Director of Town Panchayats, O/o.The Directorate of Town Panchayats, Chennai – 600 108. 2. The Assistant Executive Engineer, Town Panchayats, Sivagangai District. 3. The Executive Officer, Town Panchayat, Kamuthi Town Panchayat, Ramanathapuram District. 4. Srinivasan, S/o.Chandra Devar, Srinivasa Lorry Service, Opp. to Muthuramalingadevar Bus Stand, Kamuthi, Ramanathapuram District. ... Respondents 2 W.P.(MD)NO.20858 OF 2015 Prayer: Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating to the entire files in Roc.No. 120 of 2015 in Special Road Programme 2015-2016 Tender Notice of Kamuthi Town Panchayat of 3rd respondent and quash the same as it is against the provisions of Tamil Nadu Transparency in Tenders Act 1998 and the Rules, apart from bias and tainted with malafides and consequently directing the 3rd respondent to call for the conduct afresh Tender for the same Package at the earliest. For Petitioner : Mr.M.S.Suresh Kumar For R-1 & R-2 : Mr.D.Gandhiraj, Special Government Pleader. For R-3 : Mr.M.Murugan For R-4 : Mr.M.Muthu Geethayan * * *

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.