Krishnasamy Naicker v. The District Revenue Officer

ORDER The learned counsel on either side inform the Court that the matter has become infructuous. This writ petition is dismissed accordingly. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

17.08.2023 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No NCC : Yes / No MGA To

1.The District Revenue Officer, Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar.

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Sivakasi,

3.The Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Rajapalayam,

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. MGA and M.P(MD)No. 2 of 2015

17.08.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 17.08.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN and M.P(MD)No. 2 of 2015 1.Krishnasamy Naicker 2.Jeyaprakash ... Petitioners Vs 1.The District Revenue Officer, Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Sivakasi, 3.The Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Rajapalayam, 4.Manikandan ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records relating to the impugned order in Ne.Mu/B2/35970/13 dated 15.12.2014 on the file of the first respondent confirming the order of the second respondent herein made in Na.Ka.A1/3990/2013 dated 07.06.13 and quash the same. For Petitioners : Mr.M.Thirunavukkarasu For Respondents : Mr..N.Satheesh Kumar Additional Government Pleader for R.1 to R.3 Mr.T.Antony Arul Raj for R.4