S.Dinakaran, v. The Superintending Engineer,

ORDER The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this petition. He also made an endorsement to this effect.

¶2In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

02.08.2023 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No NCC : Yes / No MGA To

1.The Superintending Engineer, Nabard and Rural Roads, No.5, Professor Colony, Subramaniyapuram, Trichy – 20.

2.The Divisional Engineer (High Ways), Nabard and Rural Division, Nagapattinam.

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. MGA and M.P(MD)Nos.1 & 2 of 2015

02.08.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 02.08.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN and M.P(MD)Nos.1 & 2 of 2015 S.Dinakaran ... Petitioner Vs 1.The Superintending Engineer, Nabard and Rural Roads, No.5, Professor Colony, Subramaniyapuram, Trichy – 20. 2.The Divisional Engineer (High Ways), Nabard and Rural Division, Nagapattinam. ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records on the files of the first respondent pertaining to the tender notice No.08/2015-2016 Moo.Va.Tho. Aa/dated 03.11.2015 on the file of the first respondent and quash the same and consequently restraining the respondent not to issue any work order based on the impugned tender notice and consequently direct the first respondent to conduct fresh tender by calling for fresh notification. For Petitioner : Mr.S.C.Herold Singh For Respondents : Mr.S.Shanmugavel Additional Government Pleader