- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 3 November 2023
- Bench
- S.M. Subramaniam, S Justice R. Kalaimathi
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 22585/2015
Judgment
ORDER (Order of the Court was made by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.) When the matter was listed for hearing on 17.10.2023, there was no representation for the petitioner and hence, the writ petition was directed to be listed under the caption 'for dismissal' today.
2.Even though this writ petition is listed under the caption 'for dismissal' today (i.e., 03.11.2023), there is no representation for the petitioner. Hence, this writ petition is dismissed for non prosecution. No costs.
(S.M.S., J.) & (R.K.M., J.)
03.11.2023
NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No ta
S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J. AND
R. KALAIMATHI, J. ta
03.11.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 03.11.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE R. KALAIMATHI M.Kalpana ... Petitioner Vs. The Registrar General, High Court of Madras, Chennai-600 104. ...Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records in Roc. No.606/ 2011/C1 dated 09.09.2015 passed by the Respondent and quash the same and consequently direct the respondent to promote the petitioner on par with her junior as Head Clerk, Judicial Magistrate Court from 23.12.2004 as Translator from 20.09.2006 and as Sherishadar, Sub - Court from 05.12.2007. For Petitioner : No Appearance For Respondent : Mr.D.Venkatesh
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.