VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

M.Arokiyasamy v. The Chief Engineer (Personnel)

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
18 August 2023
Bench
S Justice L.Victoria Gowriauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 20134/2023

Judgment

ORDER The present writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondents to take necessary action regarding the petitioner's representation, dated 15.02.2019 judiciously and re-instate the petitioner in service forthwith, as ordered by this Court earlier.

2.By consent of both parties, this Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal at the stage of admission itself.

3.Heard, Ms.V.Jeya Rani, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Ms.M.Parameswari, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents. Perused the materials on record.

4.The petitioner was appointed as Commercial Inspector at TANGEDCO, Trichy. As per the order passed by the Assistant Executive Engineer in Memo No.AEE/O & M/TVKY/E.CONF/2013/D.No.382/2013, dated 21.07.2013, the petitioner is under suspension from the service, Already the petitioner has given his explanation on 15.02.2019, to reinstate him in service. However, the said representation was not considered so far. Hence, the writ petition came to be filed.

¶5It is needless to point out that whenever a representation of this nature is made to a Statutory Authority, there is a duty cast upon the respondents to consider the same on its own merits and pass appropriate orders in one way or other, instead of keeping the same pending indefinitely. As such, non-consideration of the representation by the Statutory Authority would amount to dereliction of duty and hence, this Court will be justified in invoking its extraordinary powers under Article 226 of Constitution of India and direct them to consider the same within a stipulated time.

¶6It is made clear that without going into the merits of this case, this Court hereby directs the respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner, dated 15.02.2019 and pass appropriate orders, in accordance with law, within a period of twelve (12) weeks, from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

7.Accordingly, this writ petition stands disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.

18.08.2023 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes PNM To

¶1The Chief Engineer (Personnel), Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Ltd., No.144, Anna Salai, Chennai.

¶2The Superintending Engineer, Trichy Electricity Distribution Circle / Metro Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Ltd., Tirchirappalli 620 020.

L.VICTORIA GOWRI, J.

PNM ORDER IN

18.08.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 18.08.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI M.Arokiyasamy ... Petitioner Vs 1. The Chief Engineer (Personnel), Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Ltd., No.144, Anna Salai, Chennai. 2. The Superintending Engineer, Trichy Electricity Distribution Circle / Metro Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Ltd., Tirchirappalli 620 020. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to take necessary action regarding the petitioner's representation, dated 15.02.2019 judiciously and re-instate the petitioner in service forthwith as ordered previously by this Court. For Petitioner : Ms.V.Jeya Rani For Respondents : Ms.M.Parameswari Standing Counsel

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.