- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 18 August 2023
- Bench
- G.Ilangovan
- Case no.
- CRL OP(MD) 15081/2023
Judgment
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 18/08/2023 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.ILANGOVAN
1.Chandrakumar
2.Prabaharan
3.Thiruppathi ... Petitioners/Accused not known Vs State Rep.by The Inspector of Police, Puliyangudi Police Station, Tenkasi District. Cr.No.236 of 2023. ... Respondent/Complainant
For Petitioners : M/s.M.Rajarajan, Advocate. For Respondent : Mr.R.Suresh Kumar
Government Advocate (crl.side) PETITIONS FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.236 of 2023 on the file of the Respondent police. ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioners/ Accused apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences under Sections 379 of IPC in Crime No.236 of 2023, on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.
¶2The case of the prosecution is that on 27.06.2023, on information, when the defacto complainant went to the spot, the petitioners were involved in illegal sand mining. Hence the case.
¶3The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent and they have been falsely implicated in this case.
¶4The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) for the respondent police submitted that the petitioner has involved in illegal sand mining. He has transported the minerals beyond the permit limit.
¶5The learned counsel for the petitioner straight away relied upon the permission that was granted by the competent authority dated 04.05.2023 to take karambai sand from the pond area with certain conditions.
¶6The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) would submit that violating the above said conditions, the above said sand has been taken away. Hence, the FIR has been registered. Totally there are 10 accused in this case. A1 to A6 have been arrested and still in custody.
¶7There is some violation of permit or licence as the case may be issued by the competent authority. Therefore, the competent authority can proceed only under the provisions of Rules and Regulations in that aspect. Therefore, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.
¶8Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is allowed and the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their their appearance, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Sivagiri, on condition that the petitioners shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., until further orders. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 of Cr.P.C., scrupulously.
¶9The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy is made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail will stand dismissed. sd/- 18/08/2023 / TRUE COPY /
/09/2023 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. pnn
To 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, SIVAGIRI. 2 DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT. 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PULIYANGUDI POLICE STATION, TENKASI DISTRICT. 4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.15081 of 2023 Date :18/08/2023 RS/VR/SAR-(08.09.2023) 4P 5C Madurai Bench of Madras High Court is issuing certified copies in this format from 17/07/2023
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.