VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Kumar V v. Tamil Nadu Generation and Electricity and Distribution

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
18 August 2023
Bench
S Justice L.Victoria Gowriauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 20187/2023

Judgment

ORDER The present writ petition has been filed seeking direction to the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation, dated 07.08.2023 to reinstate the petitioner to service in the minimum time scale for a period of 3 years without back wages in the light of the 1st respondent's proceedings in B.P. (F.B) No.27 (Administrative Branch), dated 07.11.2002 and the Judgment of this Hon'ble Court in W.P.(MD) No.13474 of 2013 dated 18.11.2021 within the period that may be stipulated by this Court.

¶2The petitioner joined the 4th respondent office on 19.06.1989 and worked up to 30.04.1995. He was given with certificate of identification by Assistant Engineer, Construction, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Kandharvakottai and by the Line Inspector, Office of the Assistant Engineer, TNEB, Kandharvakottai. On the basis of the said identification, the petitioner was appointed as a Helper and was placed on promotion. Finally, the 3rd respondent declared the completion of probation by his proceedings, dated

17.02.1998. Further, the petitioner was transferred from the 3rd respondent Distribution Circle to the 4th respondent Distribution Circle. While so, on the basis of the complaint questioning the genuineness of the certificates produced by the petitioner, without considering the petitioner's explanation, the 4th respondent removed the petitioner from service. Aggrieved by the said order of removal from service, dated 22.12.2004, the petitioner made a representation on

07.08.2023 seeking to reinstate him in service. Since the same was not considered, this writ petition came to be filed.

¶3It is needless to point out that whenever a representation of this nature is made to a Statutory Authority, there is a duty cast upon the respondent to consider the same on its own merits and pass appropriate orders in one way or other instead of keeping the same pending indefinitely. As such, non-consideration of the representation made by the Statutory Authority would amount to dereliction of duty and hence, this Court will be justified in invoking the extraordinary powers under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

¶4Without going into the merits of the case, this Court directs the respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner, dated 07.08.2023 and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law.

¶5Accordingly, this Writ Petition stands disposed of. No costs.

18.08.2023 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No gbg To

1.Tamil Nadu Generation of Electricity and distribution (TANGEDCO), Represened by its Chairman,

2.The Chief Engineer (Personnel), TANGEDCO,

3.The Chief Engineer (Distribution), Trichy Region, TANGEDCO, Thennur, Trichy-620 017.

4.The Superintending Engineer (Distribution), Pudukkottai Distribution Circle, TANGEDCO, Pudukkottai, Pudukkottai District.

L.VICTORIA GOWRI, J.

gbg

18.08.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 18.08.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI V.Kumar ... Petitioner Vs. 1.Tamil Nadu Generation of Electricity and distribution (TANGEDCO), Represened by its Chairman, 2.The Chief Engineer (Personnel), TANGEDCO, 3.The Chief Engineer (Distribution), Trichy Region, TANGEDCO, Thennur, Trichy-620 017. 4.The Superintending Engineer (Distribution), Pudukkottai Distribution Circle, TANGEDCO, Pudukkottai, Pudukkottai District. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation, dated 07.08.2023 to reinstate the petitioner to service in the minimum time scale for a period of 3 years without back wages in the light of the 1st respondent's proceedings in B.P.(F.B) No.27 (Administrative Branch), dated 07.11.2002 and the Judgment of this Hon'ble Court in W.P.(MD) No.13474 of 2013 dated 18.11.2021 within the period that may be stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.G.Balamahendran For Respondents : M//s.M.Parameshwari Standing Counsel

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.