VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

K. Shafiullah, v. The District Collector,

DISMISSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
28 July 2023
Bench
G.R.Swaminathanauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 23283/2015

Judgment

O R D E R The counsel who filed the writ petition is no more. However, there is no need to adjourn the proceedings to issue notice to the petitioner. The learned Additional Government Pleader points out that an order had already been passed on

18.01.2016.

¶2The petitioner has to necessarily challenge the same in the manner known to law. This matter has become infructuous. This writ petition stands dismissed accordingly. No costs.

28.07.2023 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No PMU 3 W.P.(MD)NO.23283 OF 2015 To:

¶1The District Collector, Tiruchirappalli.

¶2The Revenue Divisional Officer, Musiri, Trichy District.

¶3The Tahsildar, Thuraiyur, Trichy District. 4 W.P.(MD)NO.23283 OF 2015 G.R.SWAMINATHAN,J. PMU W.P.(MD)No.23283 of 2015

28.07.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

1 W.P.(MD)NO.23283 OF 2015 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 28.07.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN W.P.(MD)No.23283 of 2015 K.Shafiullah, Rep. by his Power Agent Yogaraja ... Petitioner Vs. 1. The District Collector, Tiruchirappalli. 2. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Musiri, Trichy District. 3. The Tahsildar, Thuraiyur, Trichy District. ... Respondents Prayer: Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the third respondent to pass appropriate orders on the basis of the communication sent by the first respondent in his proceedings O.Mu.A6/15824/2015 dated 27.07.2015 an order issued in pursuance of a direction issued by this Court in W.P. (MD)No.12009 of 2015 dated 15.07.2015 within the time frame. 2 W.P.(MD)NO.23283 OF 2015 For Petitioner : No appearance. For R-1 & R-2 : Mr.D.Gandhiraj, Special Government Pleader. * * *

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.