VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

P.Jegadeesan, S/O.Pethiya, v. The Commissioner of Municipal

DISMISSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
11 August 2023
Bench
G.R.Swaminathanauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 23393/2015

Judgment

ORDER None appears for the writ petitioner.

¶2As rightly pointed out by the learned Additional Government Pleader, the subject matter pertains to the agenda to be tabled before the council meeting of the Devakottai Municipality. The meeting was to be convened on

09.12.2015. Nothing survives for further adjudication. The tenure of the council had long since expired.

¶3This writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

11.08.2023 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No NCC : Yes / No MGA To

1.The Chief Executive Officer, Tamil Nadu Wakf Board, No.1, Jaffer Syrang Street, Vallal Seethakathi Nagar, Chennai.

2.The Superintendent of Wakf / Executive Officer, Tamil Nadu Wakf Board, No.159/3, Tharpasayaram Road, Velipattinam, Ramanathapuram.

3.The Executive Officer, Sivakasi Muslim Shafi Madhah Peria Pallivasal Jamad, Sivakasi Taluk and Town, Virudhunagar District.

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. MGA and M.P(MD)Nos.1 & 2 of 2015

11.08.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 11.08.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN and M.P(MD)Nos.1 & 2 of 2015 P.Jegadeesan ... Petitioner Vs 1.The Commissioner of Municipal Administration, O/o.the Commissioner of Municipal Administration, Chennai – 5. 2.The Commissioner, Devakottai Municipality, Devakottai, Sivagangai District. 3.The Chairman, Devakottai Municipality, Devakottai, Sivagangai District. 4.K.Sundaralingam 5.K.Kasilingam 6.Kalimuthu ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records relating to the impugned resolution passed by the third respondent in his proceedings Nil dated 27.11.2015 and quash the same as illegal insofar as it relates to Subject No.33, 36, 37, 38, 51, 52, 54, 56 & 57. For Petitioner : No Appearance For Respondents : Mr.S.Shanmugavel Additional Government Pleader for R.1 Mr.J.Anandakumar for R.2 & R.3

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.