S.Jeyalakshmi, v. The Branch Manager,

O R D E R The learned counsel who filed the writ petition is no more.

¶2I went through the averments set out in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition. The prayer is sought against Federal Bank. As held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the decision reported in (2003) 10 SCC 733 (Federal Bank Ltd., V. Sagar Thomas), a writ petition against a scheduled bank is not maintainable. The parties have to adjudicate their dispute before the jurisdictional civil Court.

¶3With this liberty to the petitioners, this writ petition stands dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

28.07.2023 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No PMU 3 W.P.(MD)NO.23507 OF 2015 G.R.SWAMINATHAN,J. PMU W.P.(MD)No.23507 of 2015

28.07.2023

1 W.P.(MD)NO.23507 OF 2015 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 28.07.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN W.P.(MD)No.23507 of 2015 AND M.P.(MD)Nos.2 & 3 of 2015 1. S.Jeyalakshmi 2. S.Vinoth Manikandan 3. A.Tharanya 4. Sudhakaran ... Petitioners Vs. 1. The Branch Manager, M/s.Federal Bank, Tuticorin. 2. The Officer Incharge, M/s.Reserve Bank of India, Banking Division, Chennai. 3. S.Sundarakrishnan ... Respondents Prayer: Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent to permit the fourth petitioner S.Sudhakaran to operate the bank Account No.11915500003278 with the first respondent bank in the name of M/s.Krishna and Co. 2/91A, Tiruchendur Road, Thoothukudi based on the petitioner's representation dated 10.09.2015 according to law. 2 W.P.(MD)NO.23507 OF 2015 For Petitioner : No appearance. * * *