VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

S.Pari v. The Regional Passport Officer

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
13 July 2026
Bench
M.Dhandapaniauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 19693/2026

Follow Madras High CourtFollow M.Dhandapani

Judgment

O R D E R This Writ Petition has been filed seeking the issuance of a writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent to issue the passport to the petitioner, by considering the petitioner's application in Application No.TR1066436346526 dated 20.02.2026.

2.Heard Mr. M.Suresh, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, Mr. B.Brijesh Kishore, learned Central Government Standing Counsel, who accepts notice on behalf of the first respondent, and Mr.R.Mohamed Riyaz, learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side), who accepts notice on behalf of the second respondent.

3.By consent of both parties, the Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal at the stage of admission itself.

4.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner had made an application for issuance of his passport. However, the same has not been disposed of on the ground that a criminal case is pending against him. Hence, the present Writ Petition has been filed seeking the aforesaid relief.

5.The learned Central Government Standing Counsel appearing for the first respondent submitted that, since a criminal case is pending before the competent criminal Court, the petitioner has to approach the said Court, obtain its prior permission and produce the order along with his application, as contemplated under the Passport Act and the Passport Manual. Accordingly, he prayed for appropriate orders.

6.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner may be permitted to approach the competent criminal Court for appropriate orders.

7.The issue involved in the present Writ Petition is no longer res integra. The same has been decided by the Full Bench of this Court in W.P(MD)No.26547 of 2025, dated 09.02.2026 [Jawahar Rajan vs. The Regional Passport Officer and another], wherein paragraphs 20 and 21 read as follows: "20.In fine, the question of reference is answered affirmatively that reissue / renewal of a passport has to be treated by the Passport Officer in the same manner as the issuance of a fresh passport. In other words, the rigor of Section 6(2)(f) of the Act subject to exemption under GSR 570(E) dated 25.08.1993 and the instructions in OM dated

10.10.2019 will apply to all applicants either as a fresh application or renewal / reissue.

21.Insofar as the case in hand, on the date of application for passport under TATKAAL scheme a criminal case against the writ petitioner pending trial before the Judicial Magistrate Court No.I, Madurai, in C.C.No.1730 of 2022, after taking cognizance. Therefore, he has to get prior permission of the Court concerned and submit the same along with his application, as contemplated under the Passport Act and Manual."

¶8Applying the ratio laid down by the Full Bench of this Court in W.P(MD)No.26547 of 2025, dated 09.02.2026, the petitioner is directed to approach the competent criminal Court, obtain the prior permission of the Court concerned, and submit the order along with his application, as contemplated under the Passport Act and the Passport Manual. Upon such submission, the first respondent shall consider the same and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of six (6) weeks from the date of receipt of the order of the competent criminal Court.

9.With the above observations and directions, the writ petition stands allowed. No costs.

13.07.2026 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No PKN To

¶1The Regional Passport Officer, Regional Passport Office, Tiruchirappalli New Municipal Complex, Thillai Nagar 7th Cross, Tiruchirappalli.

¶2The Inspector of Police, Thirugokarnam Police Station, Pudukkottai District.

M.DHANDAPANI, J. PKN

13.07.2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 13.07.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI S.Pari ... Petitioner Vs 1. The Regional Passport Officer, Regional Passport Office, Tiruchirappalli New Municipal Complex, Thillai Nagar 7th Cross, Tiruchirappalli. 2. The Inspector of Police, Thirugokarnam Police Station, Pudukkottai District. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st respondent to issue the passport to the petitioner, by considering the petitioners application in Application No.TR1066436346526 dated 20.02.2026. For Petitioner : Mr. M.Suresh For Respondents : Mr.B.Brijesh Kishore (R1) Central Government Standing Counsel : Mr.R.Mohamed Riyaz (R2) Government Advocate (Criminal Side)

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.