- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 18 April 2023
- Bench
- B.Pugalendhi
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 2391/2015
Judgment
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 18.04.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI and M.P.(MD)Nos.1 and 1 of 2015 W.P.(MD)No.2391 of 2015 S.P.Agencies Rep. by its Managing Partner, Tmt. S.Poovammal, No.51A/10, Masilamani Nagar, Tirunelveli – 5. ... Petitioner versus
¶4Tamil Nadu Ware Housing Corporation, Rep. by its Managing Director, No.82, Anna Salai, Chennai – 32. ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, to forbear the respondents 1 to 3 from levying and collecting demurrage charges or wharfage charges or any other charges with regard to the goods unloaded by the petitioner on behalf of the 4th respondent for the delay in unloading or detention of wagons at Tirunelveli goods shed by taking into account the time from 10 p.m. to 6 a.m. on the succeeding day (i.e., during night hours) and to direct the respondents 1 to 3 to refund the money already collected from the 4th respondent (which is also deducted by the 4th respondent from the amount payable to the petitioner) corresponding to the amount of demurrage or wharfage charges levied for the delay occurred in the unloading/detention of wagons during night hours i.e. from 10 p.m. to 6 a.m. on the succeeding day. For Petitioner : Mr.Nirajan S.Kumar For R1 to R3 : Mr.K.R.Laxman For R4 : No appearance W.P.(MD)No.2393 of 2015 L.Helen ... Petitioner versus
¶4Tamil Nadu Civil Supplies Corporation, Rep. by its Managing Director, No.10, Thabmusamy Road, Kilpauk, Chennai – 10. ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, to forbear the respondents 1 to 3 from levying and collecting demurrage charges or wharfage charges or any other charges with regard to the goods unloaded by the petitioner on behalf of the 4th respondent for the delay in unloading or detention of wagons at Tirunelveli goods shed by taking into account the time from 10 p.m. to 6 a.m. on the succeeding day (i.e., during night hours) and to direct the respondents 1 to 3 to refund the money already collected from the 4th respondent (which is also deducted by the 4th respondent from the amount payable to the petitioner) corresponding to the amount of demurrage or wharfage charges levied for the delay occurred in the unloading/detention of wagons during night hours i.e. from 10 p.m. to 6 a.m. on the succeeding day. For Petitioner : Mr.Nirajan S.Kumar For R1 to R3 : Mr.K.R.Laxman For R4 : Mr.G.Mohankumar COMMON ORDER The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw these writ petitions. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.
¶2In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, these writ petitions are dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
18.04.2023 ogy NCC : Yes / No. Index : Yes / No. Internet : Yes / No. To
¶4The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu Ware Housing Corporation, No.82, Anna Salai, Chennai – 32.
B.PUGALENDHI, J. ogy
¶5The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu Civil Supplies Corporation, No.10, Thabmusamy Road, Kilpauk, Chennai – 10.
18.04.2023
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.