Ramaiah, S/O Shanmugam v. The Block Development Officer,

O R D E R Heard the learned counsel on either side.

¶2It is seen that before filing the writ petition, the petitioner filed O.S.No.26 of 2011 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Ambasamudram and the suit was dismissed. No first appeal had been filed. In these circumstances, the question of interfering with the impugned order does not arise. This writ petition stands dismissed. No costs.

24.08.2023 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No PMU 3 W.P.(MD)NO.2591 OF 2015 To: The Block Development Officer, Ambasamudram, Tirunelveli District. 4 W.P.(MD)NO.2591 OF 2015 G.R.SWAMINATHAN,J. PMU W.P.(MD)No.2591 of 2015

24.08.2023

1 W.P.(MD)NO.2591 OF 2015 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 24.08.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN W.P.(MD)No.2591 of 2015 Ramaiah ... Petitioner Vs. 1. The Block Development Officer, Ambasamudram, Tirunelveli District. 2. The Panchayat President, Mannarkovil Panchayat, Ambasamudram Taluk, Tirunelveli District. 3. Chithai Ramaiah 4. P.Shunmugavel, President, Mannarkovil Panchayat, Ambasamudram Taluk, Tirunelveli District. ... Respondents Prayer: Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records in connection with the impugned order No.6 of 2014 of the respondent dated 19.12.2014 and quash the same and consequently directing respondents 2 and 4 to pay adequate compensation to the petitioner for the unlawful removal of the petitioner's shed in S.No.100 of Mannarkovil Village, Ambasamudram Taluk, Tirunelveli District. 2 W.P.(MD)NO.2591 OF 2015 For Petitioner : Mr.A.Arumugam For R-1 : Mr.N.GA.Nataraj, Government Advocate. For R-2 : Mr.Rajarajan For R-3 & R-4 : No appearance. * * *