VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

A. Murali Kannan, v. The Revenue Divisional Officer

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
7 August 2023
Bench
G.R.Swaminathanauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 2953/2015

Judgment

ORDER What is under challenge is a mere notice.

¶2This by itself does not infringe the rights of the petitioner. The petitioners can very well participate in the enquiry. The learned counsel for the petitioners asserts that the subject matter involves investigating into the title issues and the revenue authority cannot undertake such a scrutiny. He relies on the Division Bench decision reported in 2011 (5) CTC 94 (Vishwas Foodwear Company Ltd., Vs. The District Collector). But whether the case involves a title dispute need not be gone into at this stage by the writ court. The petitioners can very well urge their contention before the first respondent.

¶3The petitioners shall appear before the first respondent on

28.08.2023 at 3.00 p.m. The petitioners will not receive any fresh notice. It is not necessary that all the petitioners should appear in person. They can very well be represented by a counsel.

¶4Granting liberty to the petitioners to raise all their contentions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

07.08.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No rmi To The Revenue Divisional Officer, RDO Office, Dindigul District.

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. rmi

07.08.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 07.08.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN and M.P.(MD)No.2 of 2015 1.A.Murali Kannan 2.Latha @ Latha Maheswari 3.Ramar 4.N.Sundaramurthi 5.Murugeshwari 6.Balakandasamy 7.Punitharani 8.Jegadeesan 9.Rajammal ... Petitioners Vs. 1.The Revenue Divisional Officer, RDO Office, Dindigul District. 2.Sugunasundari ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records relating to the Impugned summon issued by the 1st respondent in his Proceedings Na.ka. No. 2821/2014/B4 dated 28.01.2015 and quash the same as illegal. For Petitioner : Mr.Jana Alais B.Janath Ahmed For Respondent : Mr.D.Gandhiraj Special Government Pleader for R1 : Mr.M.Natarajan for R2

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.