- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 17 February 2026
- Bench
- K. Surender
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 21115/2024
Judgment
O R D E R This Writ Petition is filed directing the respondents to conduct an enquiry and cancel the illegal sub divisions made in S.No.416/42 and to restore the same in the S.No.416/43 and S.No.416/4 and consequently, to direct the respondents not to lay thar road to erect or install any pipe line in S.No.416/42 (Present) without any acquisition of land from the petitioner, as per the representation made by the petitioner dated
08.08.2024.
¶2According to the petitioner, he has given a representation dated
08.08.2024 to the respondents seeking cancellation of the illegal subdivisions made in S.No.416/42 and restoration of the same to S.No. 416/43 and S.No.416/4. Consequently, he also requested the respondents not to lay a tar road or erect or install any pipeline in S.No.416/42 (present) without acquiring the land from the petitioner. The petitioner contends that despite the submission of the representation, the official respondents have not taken any action to consider his representation. Hence, the present Writ Petition.
¶3The learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the third respondent submits that the petitioner's representation will be considered and appropriate orders will be passed accordance with law, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.
¶4Recording the above submissions, this Writ Petition is disposed of, with a direction to the third respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner, dated 08.08.2024, on merits and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, after giving due opportunity to the petitioner, as well as all other persons, who may be interested in the subject matter, within twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. It is also made clear that this Court has not expressed any of its views with regard to the merits of the matter and that it is open to the third respondent to consider the same on its own merits. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, the connected Writ Miscellaneous Petition is closed. (K.SURENDER, J.)
17.02.2026 vsg Index: Yes/No Internet: Yes/No To
1.The Director of Muncipal Administration, Commissionerate of Muncipal Administration, No.78, Urban Administative Building, SanthomeHigh Road, Chennai-600028.
2.The Executive Officer, Municipality Office, Thiruppathur, Sivagangai District.
3.The Tahsildar, Thiruppathur, Sivagangai District. K.SURENDER, J., vsg W.P (MD) No.21115 of 2024
17.02.2026
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENGH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 17.02.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.SURENDER W.P.(MD)No.21115 of 2024 and W.M.P.(MD).No.17883 of 2024 N.Karthik ... Petitioner Vs 1.The Director of Muncipal Administration, Commissionerate of Muncipal Administration, No.78, Urban Administative Building, SanthomeHigh Road, Chennai-600028. 2.The Executive Officer, Municipality Office, Thiruppathur, Sivagangai District. 3.The Tahsildar, Thiruppathur, Sivagangai District. ... Respondents (R3 is impleaded vide Court order dated 18.09.2024 in W.M.P.(MD).No.18832 of 2024) PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to conduct an enquiry and cancel the illegal sub divisions made in S.No. 416/42 and to restore the same in the S.No.416/43 and S.No.416/4 and consequently, to direct the respondents not to lay thar road to erect or install any pipe line in S.No.416/42 (Present) without any acquisition of land from the petitioner, as per the representation made by the petitioner dated 08.08.2024. For Petitioner : Mr.J.Jeyakumaran For Respondents : Mr.P.Subbaraj Special Government Pleader
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.