- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 6 July 2023
- Bench
- G.R.Swaminathan
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 3343/2015
Judgment
ORDER The learned counsel for the petitioner informs the Court that the petitioner is no more and the legal heirs have not come forward to prosecute the writ petition. Hence, this writ petition is closed as abated. No costs.
06.07.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No ias To:-
1.The District Collector, Triuchirapalli District, Triuchirapalli.
2.The District Collector, Pudukottai District, Pudukottai.
3.The Assistant Land Reform Commissioner, Triuchirapalli, Triuchirapalli District.
4.The Tashildar, Thirumayam, Pudukottai District.
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. ias
06.07.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 06.07.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN Chinnaiah ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Triuchirapalli District, Triuchirapalli. 2.The District Collector, Pudukottai District, Pudukottai. 3.The Assistant Land Reform Commissioner, Triuchirapalli, Triuchirapalli District. 4.The Tashildar, Thirumayam, Pudukottai District. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents herein to consider and pass order on the petitioner's representation dated 05.12.2014. For Petitioner : Mr.P.Venkata Subramanian For Respondents : Mrs.K.Christy Theboral, Addl. Government Pleader.
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.