VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

T.R. Valsa Kumari v. The Assistant Executive

CLOSED AS INFRUCTUOUS
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
29 August 2023
Bench
G.R.Swaminathanauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 3471/2015

Judgment

ORDER The issue pertains to removal of electric poles.

¶2The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner states that the poles have already been removed. Nothing survives for further adjudication.

¶3This writ petition is closed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.

29.08.2023 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No NCC : Yes / No MGA To

1.The Assistant Executive Engineer,

2.The Assistant Executive Engineer (Distribution), Pudukadai,

3.The Assistant Engineer (Distribution),

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. MGA

29.08.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 29.08.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN T.R.Valsa Kumari ... Petitioner Vs 1.The Assistant Executive Engineer, 2.The Assistant Executive Engineer (Distribution), Pudukadai, 3.The Assistant Engineer (Distribution), ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records pertaining to the proceedings of the second respondent in Lr No AEE/D/PKD/CA/F/Comp/R 277/15 dated 23.02.2015 and quash the same and direct the respondents to forthwith remove the electric pole situated in the petitioner's property i.e.Survey No 122-15-1 and 122-17 of an extent of 50 cents situated at Ealudesam Village, Vulavancode Taluk, Kanyakumari District. For Petitioner : Mr.A.Robinson For Respondents : Mr.A.V.Ramanathan

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.