VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Rajammal, v. Yesudasan,

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
5 September 2023
Bench
C.Kumarappanauthor
Case no.
CRP(MD) 1986/2019

Judgment

ORDER The instant Civil Revision Petition has been filed against the order, dated 05.09.2019, made in E.A.No.80 of 2019, in E.P.No.64 of 2015, on the file of the Sub Court, Uthamapalayam, in O.S.No.84 of 2010, on the filed of the Sub Court, Padmanabhapuram.

¶2The very Revision Petition has been filed by the third party, who is the mother of the judgment debtor, viz., one Anbalagan. It appears from the records that the plaintiff has filed the suit for recovery of money, before the Sub Court, Padmanabhapuram and obtained a decree on 03.02.2011. Subsequent to the decree, the sale was transmitted to the Uthamapalayam Sub Court and an execution application has been filed in E.P.No.64 of 2015, in respect of second item of property situated in S.F.Nos.1161, 1168/3, 1180 and 1181 of Uthamapuram village.

¶3During the pendency of the said Execution Petition, the third party, viz., Rajammal,who is the mother of the judgment debtor and the second respondent / Anbalagan filed application under Order 21 Rule 58 C.P.C raising a claim in respect of the Well and Pumpsets situated in S.F.No.1181. In order to understand the whole gamut of issue, this Court deems it appropriate to extract the relevant objection raised by the third party claim. The same is found a place in Para No.4 of the affidavit in E.A.No.80 of 2019. The same reads as follows: ",e;epiyapy; fpisk;jhuh; jd;iftrk; irj;J mDgtpj;J tUfpd;w kDr; nrhj;jhdJ cj;jkGuk; fpuhkk;> rh;Nt vz;.1181-y; 1 Vf;fh; 22 nrz;by; Nky;gf;fk; 98 nrz;bw;F neLNtyp kzy;fhL tl;lj;jpy; gioa gl;lh vz;. 530-f;F Gjpa gl;lh vz;.1768 Mf cs;sJ. fpisk;jhuUf;F nrhe;jkhd Nkw;gb kDr;nrhj;jpy; njd;Nkw;F %iyapy; fpisk;jhuNu jdJ nrhe;j nrytpy; fpzW mikj;J> kpd; ,izg;G S.C.No.242 ngw;W mjpy; 7 ½ HP kpd;Nkhl;lhh;> gk;Gnrl;L kw;Wk; cgfuzq;fis mikj;J> fpisk;jhuh; kl;LNk jdpj;J ghj;jpakhfp> mDgtpj;J tUfpwhh;." At this juncture, the learned counsel for the decree holder / first respondent herein has fairly conceded the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, and would submit that they are only interested in the property situated in S.No.1180 to an extent of 74 cents and S.No.1181 of an extent of 24 cents and the total extent is 98 cents in Uthamapuram village, and the alleged Well and Pump sets connection in S.C.No.242 could be excluded from the description of property.

¶4The submissions made by the learned counsel for the decree holder / first respondent herein is recorded. In view of the above submission, this Court is of the firm view that the finding of the trial Court is liable to be interfered with. Hence, the claim in respect of the Well and Motor connection in S.C.No.242 is upheld and the same is ordered to be removed from the description of the property.

¶5It is made clear that the item No.2 of the execution petition is only the land in S.F.No.1180 of an extent of 74 cents and in S.F.No. 1181 of an extent of 24 cents, totally of an extend of 98 cents in Uthapuram Village.

¶6At this juncture, the learned counsel for the decree holder/ first respondent herein would submit that they conceded the submission only in respect of this E.P, and he may be given liberty to adjudicate in a suit separately instituted by the petitioner herein, in respect of the disputed claim of Well and the Motor connection.

¶7Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the decree holder, this Court gives liberty to the decree holder to adjudicate his right over the Well and Motor connection in a suit instituted by the petitioner herein in O.S.No.149 of 2019 on the file of the Sub Court, Uthamapalayam.

¶8The instant Civil Revision Petition stands disposed of as indicated above. There shall be no order as to cost. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

05.09.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index :Yes/No Ls To

1.The Sub Court, Padmanabhapuram.

2.The Sub Court, Uthamapalayam.

3.The Section Officer, VR Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. C.KUMARAPPAN.,J. Ls C.R.P(MD)No.1986 of 2019

05.09.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 05.09.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN and C.M.P.(MD)No.10241 of 2019 Rajammal ... Petitioner / Petitioner (Claimant)/ 3rd Party / 3rd Party Vs. 1.Yesudasan ... 1st Respondent / 1st Respondent/ Petitioner (Decree holder)/Plaintiff 2.Anbalagan ... 2nd Respondent/2nd Respondent / Respondent (Judgment Debtor)/ Defendant Prayer: This Civil Revision Petition is filed 115 of the Civil Procedure Code, against the fair order and decretal order, dated 05.09.2019, made in E.A.No.80 of 2019, in E.P.No.64 of 2015, on the file of the Sub Court, Uthamapalayam, in O.S.No.84 of 2010, on the filed of the Sub Court, Padmanabhapuram. For Petitioners : Mr.K.Guhan For Respondents : Mr.C.Dhanaseelan for R1 : No appearance for R2

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.