- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 10 July 2023
- Bench
- G.R.Swaminathan
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 3811/2015
Judgment
ORDER None appears for the writ petitioner.
2.The learned standing for the first respondent states that on
18.04.2017 itself the petition mentioned document was returned and the MOD has been subsequently cancelled and nothing survives for further adjudication in this writ petition.
3.Recording the said submission, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
10.07.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No ias
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. ias
10.07.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 10.07.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN Krishnan ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Regional Manager, State Bank of India, Madurai. 2.The Branch Manager, State Bank of India, Tiurvadanai Branch, Ramnad District. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents to release the petitioner's document kept pending with the 2nd respondent. For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondents : Mr.N.Dilipkumar, Standing Counsel for R1.
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.