VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

M/S. Tranquebar Bisho Manikam v. The Assistant Provident Fund

DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
17 July 2023
Bench
Battu Devanandauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 3906/2015

Judgment

O R D E R Mr.Karthikeyan,

learned

counsel

representing Mr.P.Chandra Bose, learned counsel for the petitioner on record submits that in view of the subsequent developments happened after filing of this Writ Petition, this Writ Petition has become infructuous and as such, no further adjudication is required.

¶2The statement of the learned counsel is placed on record.

¶3In the light of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, in my considered view, nothing survives in this Writ Petition and it has to be dismissed as infructuous.

¶4Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous.

¶4No costs.

¶5Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

17.07.2023 Index : Yes / No NCC : Yes / No CM To,

1.The Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner, Employees' Provident Fund Organization, Sub Regional Office,No.18, Sri Complex, Madurai Road, Trichy – 8.

2.The Recovery Officer, Employees' Provident Fund Organization, Sub Regional Office, No.18, Sri Complex, Madurai Road, Trichy – 8.

BATTU DEVANAND, J. CM W.P.(MD)No.3906 of 2015 and M.P(MD)Nos.1 and 2 of 2015

17.07.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 17.07.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND W.P.(MD)No.3906 of 2015 and M.P(MD)Nos.1 and 2 of 2015 M/s. Tranquebar Bishop Manikam Lutheran College, Porayar – 609 307, Nagapattinam District Through its Secretary ...Petitioner Vs. 1.The Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner, Employees' Provident Fund Organization, Sub Regional Office, No.18, Sri Complex, Madurai Road, Trichy – 8. 2.The Recovery Officer, Employees' Provident Fund Organization, Sub Regional Office, No.18, Sri Complex, Madurai Road, Trichy – 8. 3. The Branch Manager, City Union Bank Limited, 15-167, Shandaveli Street, Porayar – 609 307 Nagapattinam District. ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records from the file of the 1st respondent herein in No.TN/SRO-TRY/PDC/C-34/43046/2015 dated 27.02.2015 and to quash the same and to direct the 3rd respondent not to disburse the amount accrued in the bank account of the petitioner to the 2nd respondent. For Petitioner : Mr.Karthikeyan for Mr.P.Chandra Bose For R1 & R2 : Mr.N.Dilip Kumar For R3 : No appearance

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.