VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Libisha V v. The Superintendent of Police

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
22 August 2023
Bench
D.Nagarjunauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 20251/2023

Judgment

ORDER This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking for a Mandamus to the respondent No.2 to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 17.07.2023.

2.According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner being a wife of the respondent No.3 has filed a complaint against the respondent No.3 and his family members, but the police have not taken any action.

3.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) on the other hand submits that the complaint of the petitioner dated 17.07.2023 is registered as CSR.No.282 of 2023 and an enquiry is being initiated and within short time, the police will complete the enquiry.

4.Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side and on perusal of the records, this Petition is disposed of directing the respondent police to complete the enquiry on the complaint given by the petitioner dated

17.07.2023 as expeditiously as possible, not later than two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs.

Speaking : Yes / No

22.08.2023 NCC : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No Index : Yes / No mm To

1.The Superintendent of Police, Kanyakumari District, Nagercoil.

2.The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Kulachal, Kanyakumari District.

DR.D.NAGARJUN, J. mm

22.08.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 22.08.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE D.NAGARJUN V.Libisha ... Petitioner /vs./ 1.The Superintendent of Police, Kanyakumari District, Nagercoil. 2.The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Kulachal, Kanyakumari District. 3.Merlin Jebarson 4.P.Martin 5.Jasmine Suji ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the 2nd respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 17.07.2023 and subsequently, conduct proper enquiry for the initiation of legal process as per law as against the respondents 3 to 5 forthwith. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Palanivelayutham For R1 and R2 : Mr.B.Thanga Aravindh Government Advocate (criminal side)

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.