V.Jeyabal, v. The Director,

ORDER None appears for the petitioner.

¶2The petitioner's name is printed in the cause list. The petitioner wants to take action against the fifth respondent for some statutory violations. Events date back to March 2015. We are now in July 2023. If the petitioner is still having any subsisting grievance, it is always open to him to move the authorities concerned and the authorities are obliged to take action. No specific order is required for the present.

¶3This writ petition is disposed of accordingly. There shall be no order as to costs.

05.07.2023 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No NCC : Yes / No MGA To

1.The District Collector, Trichirappalli.

2.The Deputy Superintendent (Cable TV), Tahsildar, Trichirappalli.

3.The Sub-Inspector of Police, Uppiliyapuram, Thuraiyur Taluk, Trichy District.

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. MGA

05.07.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 05.07.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN V.Jeyabal ... Petitioner Vs 1.The Director, Tamil Nadu Arasu Cable TV Corporation Ltd., Mankundusamy Street, Nungambakkam, Chennai. 2.The District Collector, Trichirappalli. 3.The Deputy Superintendent (Cable TV), Tahsildar, Trichirappalli. 4.The Sub-Inspector of Police, Uppiliyapuram, Thuraiyur Taluk, Trichy District. 5.S.Ramaiah ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 3 & 4 to initiate necessary action against the fifth respondent for his all acts of violation of the provisions of the CABLE TV Network (Regulation ) Act, 1995 and as per the letter of the third respondent in his proceedings Na.Ka.A7/2014 dated 27.11.2014. For Petitioner : No Appearance For Respondents : Mr.David Sundar Singh For R.1 Mr.SRA.Ramachandran Additional Government Pleader for R.2 to R.4 Mr.A.Haja Mohideen For R.5