VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Saraswathi D v. The Revenue Divisional Officer

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
22 August 2023
Bench
B.Pugalendhiauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 20358/2023

Judgment

ORDER The petitioner had submitted a representation to the second respondent on 02.04.2014, seeking issuance of patta for the land in Survey No.216/1 situated at K.Paramathi Village, Aravakurich Taluk. Since there was no response, she had submitted another representation dated 22.04.2014 to the first respondent, who in turn directed the second respondent to take action on her application, vide his proceedings in O.Mu.No.1312/2014(A4) dated 08.05.2014. Thereafter, Aravakurichi Taluk was bifurcated and a new Taluk, namely, Pugalur Taluk was created. Therefore, she once again submitted a representation dated 08.08.2023 to the third respondent stating all those facts and seeking for issuance of patta in her name. However, there was no response. Hence, the present writ petition has been filed.

¶2Mr.P.T.Thiraviam, learned Government Advocate, who takes notice for the respondents, based on the 'A' register, submits that the land in Survey No.216/1 is a temple land it stands in the name of Munnur Maragatheeswarar Kovil and therefore, patta cannot be granted in the petitioner's name.

¶3Considering the fact that the petitioner's representation dated

08.08.2023 is lying with the 3rd respondent, the 3rd respondent is directed to dispose of the petitioner's representation dated 08.08.2023 on its merits and in accordance with law, within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, enabling the petitioner to work out her remedy in the manner known to law.

¶4With the above direction, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs.

22.08.2023 ogy NCC : Yes / No. Index : Yes / No. Internet : Yes / No. To

¶1The Revenue Divisional Officer, Karur, Karur District.

¶2The Tahsildar, Aravaikurichi Taluk, Karur District.

¶3The Tahsildar, Pugalur Taluk, Karur District.

B.PUGALENDHI, J. ogy

22.08.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 22.08.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI D.Saraswathi ... Petitioner versus 1. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Karur, Karur District. 2. The Tahsildar, Aravaikurichi Taluk, Karur District. 3. The Tahsildar, Pugalur Taluk, Karur District. ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, to direct the 3rd respondent to expedite the patta proceedings and complete the same within a stipulated time in the light of the proceedings of 1st respondent in O.Mu.1312/2014(A4) dated 08.05.2014 by considering the petitioner's representation dated 08.08.2023. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Arumugam For Respondents : Mr.P.T.Thiraviam, Government Advocate

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.