VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

A.Gurunathan, v. The District Collector,

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
5 July 2023
Bench
G.R.Swaminathanauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 4694/2015

Judgment

ORDER Heard the learned counsel appearing for petitioner, the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the official respondents and the learned counsel appearing for the thirteenth respondent.

¶2The grievance of the petitioner is that a pucca road to Linganayakkanpatti from Nalluthevanpatti is not being laid on account of encroachments. He wants the encroachments to be removed and the road laid.

¶3When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned Additional Government Pleader on instructions submitted that under a new scheme, formation of road to Linganayakkanpatti has been sanctioned and it is to be laid shortly. It is further stated that if any encroachments are found, the same will be removed.

¶4Recording the said submission of the official respondents, this writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

05.07.2023 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No NCC : Yes / No MGA To

1.The District Collector, Madurai District, Madurai.

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer,

3.The Tahsildar, Usilampatti Taluk, Madurai,

4.The Commissioner (Village Panchayat),

5.The Inspector of Police, Town Police Station,

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. MGA and M.P(MD)No.1 of 2015

05.07.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 05.07.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN and M.P(MD)No.1 of 2015 A.Gurunathan ... Petitioner Vs 1.The District Collector, Madurai District, Madurai. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, 3.The Tahsildar, Usilampatti Taluk, Madurai, 4.The Commissioner (Village Panchayat), 5.The Inspector of Police, Town Police Station, 6.Periyasamy 7.Perumal 8.Ramar 9.Mokkayan 10.Patitavathal @ Palanisamy 11.Rajeshwari 12.Cinnapinnathavar 13.Muthusamy 14.Payammal 15.Balu 16.Aiyyer 17.Pootharaj 18.Periyakaruppan 19.Karupaiya 20.Aiyyer 21.Katturaja 22.Muthurakku 23.Muthaiah ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 5 to remove the encroachment and then lay the road in the Nalluthavanpatti Village leading to Liganayakkanpatti Village. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Rajarajan For Respondents : Mr.SRA.Ramachandran Additional Government Pleader for R.1 to R.5 Mr.J.Barathan for R.13 No Appearance for R.6 to R.12 & R.14 to R.23

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.