VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Ganesan v. The Block Development Officer

CLOSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
16 March 2023
Bench
B.Pugalendhiauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 5190/2015

Judgment

O R D E R This Writ Petition has been filed challenging the auction notice of the year 2015.

¶2When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the second respondent would submit that this Writ Petition has become infructuous and nothing survives for further adjudication.

¶3Recording their submission, this Writ Petition is closed as no further order is required. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

16.03.2023 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No CM To,

1.The Block Development Officer (Village Panchayat), Nilakkottai Panchayat Union, Nilakkottai, Dindigul District

¶2The President, Pachamalaiyan Kottai Village Panchayat, Pachamalaiyan Kottai, Nilakottai Taluk, Dindigul District

B.PUGALENDHI, J. CM and M.P(MD)Nos.1 and 2 of 2015

16.03.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 16.03.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI and M.P(MD)Nos.1 and 2 of 2015 Ganesan ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Block Development Officer (Village Panchayat), Nilakkottai Panchayat Union, Nilakkottai, Dindigul District 2. The President, Pachamalaiyan Kottai Village Panchayat, Pachamalaiyan Kottai, Nilakottai Taluk, Dindigul District ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus challenging the auction notification issued by the respondents in their proceedings in Na.Ka.No.1425/15/thi3 dated 01.04.2015 published in Thinathanthi Tamil Daily dated 03.04.2015 and quash the same insofar as item No.2 is concerned, and consequently restrain the respondents from permitting the unauthorized fruit vendors to sell fruits in places inside Sempatti Bus Stand and thereby ensure free and fair fruit business of the petitioner. For Petitioner : Mr.N.Sathish Babu For R1 : Mr.S.Shaji Bino Special Government Pleader For R2 : Mr.R.R.Kannan

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.