A. Abdul Rahuman, v. The Revenue Divisional

O R D E R None appears for the petitioner.

¶2What is under challenge is a mere notice which by itself does not affect the rights of the writ petitioner. Leaving open all the contentions and defences of the petitioner, this writ petition stands dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

07.08.2023 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No PMU To:

¶1The Revenue Divisional Officer, Pudukottai.

¶2The Tahsildar, Thirumayam Taluk, Pudukottai District. 3 W.P.(MD)NO.5284 OF 2015 G.R.SWAMINATHAN,J. PMU W.P.(MD)No.5284 of 2015

07.08.2023

1 W.P.(MD)NO.5284 OF 2015 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 07.08.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN W.P.(MD)No.5284 of 2015 AND M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2015 A.Abdul Rahuman ... Petitioner Vs. 1. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Pudukottai. 2. The Tahsildar, Thirumayam Taluk, Pudukottai District. 3. Vijayakumari ... Respondents Prayer: Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records of the impugned summon issued by the first respondent in Na.Ka.No.A4/4194/2014 dated 16.02.2015 and quash the same and direct the first respondent not to make any alteration in relevant revenue records. For Petitioner : No appearance. For R-1 & R-2 : Mrs.K.Christy Theboral, Additional Government Pleader. * * * 2 W.P.(MD)NO.5284 OF 2015