- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 5 July 2023
- Bench
- G.R.Swaminathan
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 5498/2015
Judgment
ORDER The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner informs the Court that the matter has become infructuous. This writ petition is dismissed accordingly. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
05.07.2023 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No NCC : Yes / No MGA To
1.The District Revenue Officer, Dindigul District,
2.The Revenue Divisional Officer,
3.The Tahsildar, Nilakottai Taluk, Nilakottai,
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. MGA and M.P(MD)No.2 of 2015
05.07.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 05.07.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN and M.P(MD)No.2 of 2015 1.Chinna Nallu 2.Kubendran ... Petitioners Vs 1.The District Revenue Officer, Dindigul District, 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, 3.The Tahsildar, Nilakottai Taluk, Nilakottai, 4.V.Rajendran ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the second respondents 2 and 3 herein from in any way altering or effecting mutation of the revenue records in respect of the property of the second petitioner comprised in Survey No. 315/3 admeasuring 3 Acres 33 cents in Sitherkalnatham Village, Nilakkottai Taluk, For Petitioners : Mr.R.Suresh Kumar For Respondents : Mr.N.Satheesh Kumar Additional Government Pleader for R.1 to R.3 Mr.P.Ganapathi Subramanian for R.4
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.