Saradha v. The Superintending Engineer

ORDER Heard the learned counsel on either side.

2.This writ petition was filed for forbearing the respondents from erecting the transformer in front of her land.

3.During the pendency of this writ petition, the transformer has already been erected and nothing survives for further adjudication in this writ petition. Hence, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

12.07.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No ias

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. ias

12.07.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 12.07.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2015 Saradha ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Superintending Engineer, Tamilnadu Electricity Board, Nagercoil, Kanayakumari District. 2.The Divisional Engineer, Tamilnadu Electricity Board, Marthandam Post, Kanayakumari District. 3.The Assistant Engineer, Distribution and Maintenance, Tamilnadu Electricity Board, Suriacode Post, Kanayakumari District. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the respondents from erecting the transformer in front of the petitioner's house property and agricultural land situated in Re-Survey No.383/14 corresponding old survey No.4103 and 4104 of Kulapuram Village, Vilavancode Taluk, Kanayakumari District having an extent of two acres thirteen cents. For Petitioner : Mr.S.C.Herold Singh For Respondents : Mr.S.Deenadhayalan, Standing Counsel.