N.Jeyaprakash v. The District Collector

O R D E R [Order of the Court was made by The Hon'ble CHIEF JUSTICE] We have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Advocate for the respondent No.1.

¶2The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner already has a decree in his favour. If the petitioner has a decree in his favour, then the petitioner has to execute the decree and not to file a writ petition for execution of the decree.

¶3If there is an encroachment on the public pathway, then, it is for the Government authorities to consider the same.

¶4With this observation, the writ petition stands disposed of. However, there is no order as to costs. Consequently connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. [S.V.G., .C.J.] [L.V.G., J.]

30.11.2023 Index : Yes / No : Yes / No

RR To:

¶1The District Collector, Madurai District, Madurai..

¶2The Executive Officer, Vadipatti Panchayat Union, Vadipatti, Madurai District.. W.P.(MD)No.14313 of 2018 THE HONOURABLE CHIEF JUSTICE and L.VICTORIA GOWRI , J . RR W.P.(MD)No.14313 of 2018

30.11.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 30.11.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.SANJAY V.GANGAPURWALA, CHIEF JUSTICE and THE HONOURABLE Mrs.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI W.P.(MD) No.14313 of 2018 and WMP(MD) No.15409 of 2018 N.Jeyaprakash, ... Petitioner Vs 1. The District Collector, Madurai District, Madurai.. 2. The Executive Officer, Vadipatti Panchayat Union, Vadipatti, Madurai District.. 3. Chellammal, W/o. Veerappan Servai, Sadayandi Kovil Street, Kulasekarankottai, Vadipatti Taluk, Madurai District.. ... Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents to remove the encroachment made in Sy.No.578/21, in Kulasekarankottai village, Vadipatti Taluk, Madurai District by considering the representation dated 29.01.2018. For Petitioner : M/s.P.Jessi Jeeva Priya For Respondent : Mr.T.Amjad Khan for R1 Government Advocate