- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 3 August 2023
- Bench
- G.R.Swaminathan
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 575/2015
Judgment
ORDER Heard the learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioner and the learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1 and 2. Third respondent has been served and his name in printed in the cause list.
¶2It appears that there is civil dispute between the petitioner and the third respondent. Peace Committee Meeting was also conducted. The first respondent had written to the second respondent informing him that the third respondent is in possession of the property and directed the second respondent to give him police protection.
¶3If there is any imminent threat to public safety, it is open to the Executive Magistrate to invoke the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code and pass appropriate orders. The Code prescribes certain procedures. In this case, without adhering to any such procedure, the impugned communication has been sent by the respondents 1 and 2. It is patently illegal and without jurisdiction. It is quashed.
¶4This writ petition is allowed accordingly. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
03.08.2023 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No NCC : Yes / No MGA To
1.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Devakottai, Sivagangai District.
2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Devakottai, Sivagangai District.
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. MGA and M.P(MD)No.2 of 2015
03.08.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 03.08.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN and M.P(MD)No.2 of 2015 Chithambaram ... Petitioner Vs 1.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Devakottai, Sivagangai District. 2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Devakottai, Sivagangai District. 3.Subramanian ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records of the first respondent in O.Mu.A1/5884/2014 dated 22.12.2014 and quash the same as illegal and arbitrary. For Petitioner : Mr.P.Ganapathi Subramanian For Respondents : Mr.D.Gandhiraj Special Government Pleader for R.1 & R.2 No Appearance for R.3
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.