A. Satham Hussain, v. The Regional Passport

ORDER Heard the learned counsel on either side.

¶2The petitioner seeks issuance of passport. There was an impediment. His name was figuring in the rowdy list. That led to filing of this writ petition with two prayers.

¶3During the pendency of the writ petition, the name of the petitioner was removed from the history sheet on 21.09.2016. The petitioner's application would have by now been closed. It is open to the petitioner to submit a fresh application for issuance of passport.

¶4The first respondent shall consider the same and issue passport to the petitioner if there is no other impediment.

¶5The Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

10.07.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No rmi To

1.The Superintendent of Police, Ramanathapuram District, Ramanathapuram.

2.The Inspector of Police, Devipattinam Police Station, Ramanathapuram District.

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. rmi

10.07.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 10.07.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN and W.M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2015 A.Satham Hussain ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Regional Passport Officer, Bharathi Ula Road, Race Course, Madurai. 2.The Superintendent of Police, Ramanathapuram District, Ramanathapuram. 3.The Inspector of Police, Devipattinam Police Station, Ramanathapuram District. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the 3rd Respondent to remove the petitioner's name from Rowdy sheet maintained by the 3rd Respondent and consequently direct the 1st respondent to issue passport to the petitioner in file No. MD1067318224513 in accordance with law within the time that may be stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner : Mrs.N.Sumitha for M/s.Ajmal Associates For Respondents : Mr.K.Prabhu for R1 : Mr.N.Satheesh Kumar Additional Government Pleader for R2 & R3