- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 17 November 2023
- Bench
- N. Anand Venkatesh
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 21144/2021
Judgment
O R D E R The learned Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the matter has become infructuous. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is closed. No costs.
Index :Yes / No
17.11.2023 Internet :Yes / No NCC :Yes / No cmr To
1.The Tahsildar, Paramakudi, Ramanathapuram District.
2.The Village Administrative Officer, Parthibanoor, Paramakudi.
N.ANAND VENKATESH, J.
cmr
17.11.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 17.11.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH R.Subramani ... Petitioner vs. 1.The Tahsildar, Paramakudi, Ramanathapuram District. 2.Village Administrative Officer, Parthibanoor, Paramakudi. 3.Chellam 4.Bhoominathan 5.Ramalingam ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st respondent to cancel the wrong entry of Patta made with regard to Survey Nos.65/16, 65/1B6, 65/20 in Veppangulam Village, Paramakudi by considering petitioner's application dated 12.10.2021 within a time frame fixed by this Court. For Petitioner :Mr.A.Sivasubramanian For R1 and R2 :Mr.A.K.Manikkam Special Government Pleader For R3 to R5 :No Appearance *****
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.