- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 5 July 2023
- Bench
- G.R.Swaminathan
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 6299/2015
Judgment
ORDER The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner informs that the petitioner is no more. However his legal heirs have not come forward to prosecute the writ petition.
¶2This writ petition is closed as abated. There shall be no order as to costs.
05.07.2023 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No NCC : Yes / No MGA To
1.The Superintending Engineer, Nagercoil,
2.The Junior Engineer, Kulasekaram,
3.The Inspector of Police, Kulasekaram Police Station,
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. MGA
05.07.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 05.07.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN Nagappan ... Petitioner Vs 1.The Superintending Engineer, Nagercoil, 2.The Junior Engineer, Kulasekaram, 3.The Inspector of Police, Kulasekaram Police Station, ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 and 2 to pay a sum of Rs.5 lakhs as a compensation due to the death of the petitioner's 32 years old son, namely, Ranjithkumar died on 30.10.2014 under electrocution. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Ramakrishnan For Respondents : Mr.S.Deenadhayalan Standing Counsel for R.1 & R.2 Mr.N.Satheesh Kumar Additional Government Pleader for R.3
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.